If we compare now to 10 years ago, the BNP is definitely more popular as regards votes at the ballot box etc.

But then, during this Labour government, there's been a big increase in immigration.

The BNP is definitely more popular in England instead of Scotland. But then, the non-white population of England is 9%, but in Scotland it's only 3%.

So that's it then! The BNP can only become more popular if immigration increases. They actually need more of the thing they oppose the most in order to grow . Oh, what irony!
[Rep]

Nothing new here at all?!

Thatcher needed the Callaghan Labour government to mess the economy and make it even worse in the late 70s before she could even consider being the first female Prime Minister and form a government.

Churchill needed the end of appeasement, decline in Anglo-German relations and subsequent Second World War before he could ever become Prime Minister.

Roosevelt needed the Great Depression to sink even harder in the USA and destroy even more lives before his Democrat Party could even begin to be considered sensible and reasonable with their almost Socialist (to an American) 'New Deal' programme.
[Rep]

The BNP needed 9/11 to act as a trigger by blaming it on Muslims when it was an inside job.

If 9/11 never happened and the bitter feeling towards Muslims never emerged then the EDs would probably be a bigger party and get better election results.
[Rep]

I think we need more support in UKIP. We definitely need more ethnic support.

As a half ethnic myself, I can tell you that other ethnics are concerned with what's happening to our country. The best test of loyalty is times like these. Hundreds of polish economic migrants are already heading off home now that milk and honey have stopped flowing.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Dissident Congress:
The BNP needed 9/11 to act as a trigger by blaming it on Muslims when it was an inside job.

If 9/11 never happened and the bitter feeling towards Muslims never emerged then the EDs would probably be a bigger party and get better election results.

Muslims are generally decent people. I was initially caught up in believing that they were responsible for 9/11 and 7/7, but then I started listening to Alex Jones. Now I know that the same people who are selling us out to the EU are also behind the 7/7 bombings.

I look forward to regaining our country from the EU Soviet, then maggots like HM the Queen and Gordon 'Stalin' Brown will pay.
[Rep]

I don't know, I don't really believe in the "extreme" MIHOP conspiracy theories - I'm more of a LIHOP kind of guy. Obviously, I'm not taking the official 9/11 story at face value: the US Government has many vested interests.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Destroy the EU:
......

I look forward to regaining our country from the EU Soviet, then maggots like HM the Queen and Gordon 'Stalin' Brown will pay.

How do you see this as being achieved? Broon WILL pay, but why HM?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Hunter:
How do you see this as being achieved? Broon WILL pay, but why HM?

Here is the explanation

Can you answer the question?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Dissident Congress:
Here is the explanation

Can you answer the question?

What would have happened had HM not signed the 'bill'? It is almost certain that this scumbag of a Government we have would have moved to abolish the Monarchy. Had that been the case there would almost certainly have been riots, giving this Communist government the opportunity to call in the European Police, as per the 'treaty' signed by David Miliband the same day as they signed the main 'treaty'.

I'm surprised DC was not already aware of this fact. Should HM take the chance that one of Her predecessors did and publicly challenge the 'authority' of Parliament (bear in mind the flak Prince Charles has received for daring to 'interfere' in political decisions) which ultimately led to the event known as the English Civil War?

Better for now, I think, that HM be in a position to counter any fall-out from this treacherous Party, ie using Her influence with the Commonwealth and other non-European countries, that to spend a lot of time fighting off an attack from Broon and his cronies.
[Rep]

HM could point out to the government that Britain's membership of the EU is ILLEGAL under Magna Carta, and so are the treaties of Rome, Maastricht, and Lisbon. Therefore, She is under no obligation to sign the Lisbon Treaty Bill.
[Rep]