Originally Posted by The Bear:
What I wrote was

“Each and every opportunity to "out" BNP members should and in fact MUST be taken.”

And NOT that everyone who signed was.

If there are some who signed but are not members, so what? They’re just showing bad judgment or political naivety, but if the number includes BNP fellow-travelers then so much the better.

We must know who these people who support the loathsome BNP are so that if they emerge in the future they can be recognised for what they are.

Splitting hair's aren't we.

Anyway, AFAIK, it's not against the Law to be a member of the BNP is it?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by claire stone:

Anyway, AFAIK, it's not against the Law to be a member of the BNP is it?

Not yet, hopefully it soon will be.

(BTW, has anyone told you know who to take a bath more often yet?)
[Rep]

Originally Posted by The Bear:
Not yet, hopefully it soon will be.

(BTW, has anyone told you know who to take a bath more often yet?)

10,000 more criminals overnight.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by The Bear:
What I wrote was

“Each and every opportunity to "out" BNP members should and in fact MUST be taken.”

And NOT that everyone who signed was.

If there are some who signed but are not members, so what? They’re just showing bad judgment or political naivety, but if the number includes BNP fellow-travelers then so much the better.

We must know who these people who support the loathsome BNP are so that if they emerge in the future they can be recognised for what they are.

As usual, your main object is clearly to waste everyone's time in a discussion which is peripheral to the point.

Signing a nomination form for any candidate may indicate no more than general support for the democratic process.

This would include the BNP being allowed to participate along with all the others.

What is actually 'loathsome' is any attempt to indimidate & threaten those who have signed candidates' nomination forms in an open & democratic election.

It seems you are no democrat.
[Rep]

The one good thing that can be said about the BNP is that it will NEVER get into a position of any power.

Still, it keeps all the cooks in the one kitchen I guess.

Incidentally, do people really take their kids to the disgusting “Red, White & Blue “Family” Festival”?

Even if people are such knuckle dragging racist numpties themselves have they no shame in exposing their kids to such nonsense?

These kids will have to live in a world that YOU may not like, but since you can do nothing about, and you can’t, why lumber your kids with the same rubbish that you are encumbered with?

Why not give them a chance and let them grow up in the world as it is without being weighed down by all the hate, prejudice, and frustration that their parents carry since there is nothing the kids will be able to do about it when they have to go out into it let alone the contempt they will draw from normal people who they will encounter.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by The Bear:
Not yet, hopefully it soon will be.

Why would you outlaw the BNP? Are you pro-democracy or not?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by The Bear:
Even if people are such knuckle dragging racist numpties themselves have they no shame in exposing their kids to such nonsense?

These kids will have to live in a world that YOU may not like, but since you can do nothing about, and you can’t, why lumber your kids with the same rubbish that you are encumbered with?

Why not give them a chance and let them grow up in the world as it is without being weighed down by all the hate, prejudice, and frustration that their parents carry since there is nothing the kids will be able to do about it when they have to go out into it let alone the contempt they will draw from normal people who they will encounter.

It's difficult to know where to start in attacking this ridiculous viewpoint. Do you honestly think that white kids won't encounter hate, prejudice etc simply as a result of your nightmare multiethnic society? Middle-class liberal types aren't filled with 'hate' (except when it's aimed at working class whites) and yet they keep 'diversity' at arms length.

Scummy, leftist collaborators such as yourself can never give a single valid reason why white people should embrace such a society. You describe yourself as 'old'. Is this true? Any chance you'll to croak soon? It'd be a cause for much merriment at the RWB if you could manage it before the weekend.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by The Bear:
The one good thing that can be said about the BNP is that it will NEVER get into a position of any power.

Still, it keeps all the cooks in the one kitchen I guess.

Incidentally, do people really take their kids to the disgusting “Red, White & Blue “Family” Festival”?

Even if people are such knuckle dragging racist numpties themselves have they no shame in exposing their kids to such nonsense?

These kids will have to live in a world that YOU may not like, but since you can do nothing about, and you can’t, why lumber your kids with the same rubbish that you are encumbered with?

Why not give them a chance and let them grow up in the world as it is without being weighed down by all the hate, prejudice, and frustration that their parents carry since there is nothing the kids will be able to do about it when they have to go out into it let alone the contempt they will draw from normal people who they will encounter.

I wonder what your son and grandkids think of Muslims, knowing your opinion of them?

Islamaphobic perhaps?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Hunter:
And who pays the taxes to fund the UKIP MEP's who have their snouts in the EU trough? (And thus the UKIP through them.) Mr Dungworth works for a living, unlike some of our so-called representatives. It is this sort of attitude that will see the demise of the UKIP unless it, as an organisation, get their priorities sorted out.

The topic is about a Labour candidate naming those who nominated the BNP candidate in a local by-election. Your UKIP MEP comments are pathetic at best, libellous at worst and irrelevant to the topic. I note your support for Mr Dungworth who, "works for a living". Is this what your party is saying to the voters in their campaign literature? Such as, 'Steve Dungworth works for a living but does not deserve the support of the people of this ward'??

Opposing well paid (by the taxpayer) 'liberal' elites such as Mr Dungworth is what will make UKIP more credible. You need to decide if your priority is opposing UKIP (who aren't even contesting this election) or opposing the likes of Mr Dungworth. It seems your dislike of UKIP is so strong that you prefer someone like Dungworth who is happy to go to extreme lengths to oppose the BNP than a supporter of UKIP who is disgusted by his actions but who also opposes the BNP.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by London Orbital:
Signing a nomination form for any candidate may indicate no more than general support for the democratic process.

This would include the BNP being allowed to participate along with all the others.

What is actually 'loathsome' is any attempt to indimidate & threaten those who have signed candidates' nomination forms in an open & democratic election.

It seems you are no democrat.

I'm no BNP supporter and never will be, but they are a legitimate political party and should be treated as such!
[Rep]