Bear you are an absolute disgrace,i hope if you have grandchildren, they forgive you.Why dont you demonstrate against,those in our midst,who would gladly blow us up.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by alfred the great:
Bear you are an absolute disgrace,i hope if you have grandchildren, they forgive you.Why dont you demonstrate against,those in our midst,who would gladly blow us up.

Why am I a disgrace?

Present your argument.
[Rep]

To further clarify my point.Correct me if i am wrong.Since 1945 this country has witnessed unfettered open door immigration ,to the tune of probably 10 million people.Most of these have come here not with any deep love for this country,its culture or way of life. Most are here for economic reasons. That may be ok ,and understandable. Many people have thought this is ok,many people are now saying enough is enough.For the many millions who feel aggrieved about this there has ,and still is no avenue for them to object.The reason being the 3 main political parties have created the problem,and are petrified of any other way than what we have.There are many millions of ordinary decent people ,who have no voice on this matter.The only party activeley against this are indeed the BNP. With your constant BILE against this party , you are showing your deep ignorance ,and disrespect of many ordinary people. I have never been a member of the said party,but i know personally quite a few members. I would doubt if you would be fit to tie there shoelaces sir. The leadership of the part maybe a bit unpalatable for some ,OK. The problem is there is no one else who wants to tackle open door immigration,crim
[Rep]

Originally Posted by alfred the great:
To further clarify my point.Correct me if i am wrong.Since 1945 this country has witnessed unfettered open door immigration ,to the tune of probably 10 million people.Most of these have come here not with any deep love for this country,its culture or way of life. Most are here for economic reasons. That may be ok ,and understandable. Many people have thought this is ok,many people are now saying enough is enough.For the many millions who feel aggrieved about this there has ,and still is no avenue for them to object.The reason being the 3 main political parties have created the problem,and are petrified of any other way than what we have.There are many millions of ordinary decent people ,who have no voice on this matter.The only party activeley against this are indeed the BNP. With your constant BILE against this party , you are showing your deep ignorance ,and disrespect of many ordinary people. I have never been a member of the said party,but i know personally quite a few members. I would doubt if you would be fit to tie there shoelaces sir. The leadership of the part maybe a bit unpalatable for some ,OK. The problem is there is no one else who wants to tackle open door immigration,crim

Ah, right!

Now I understand!

It’s because I’m not a racist!
[Rep]

Originally Posted by The Bear:
Ah, right!

Now I understand!

It’s because I’m not a racist!

Why is any discussion about immigration deemed to be racist?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Seasider:
Why is any discussion about immigration deemed to be racist?

In the context and form that it is written about by alfred the 'great' it is.
[Rep]

Contrary to The Guardian's gutter article a few years ago I am not a member of the BNP. But I have made the effort to examine the BNP's Manifesto and I cannot see that much wrong with it. I can see far more wrong with the last 70 years of Labour Party Manifestos. So while people bang on about extremists, could someone explain how the BNP is more "extreme" than the socialists. Peter Mandelson and numerous others were members of the Communist Party prior to joining Labour. Umpteen others were self-declared doctrinairre Marxists, you know, the dogma upon which communism was founded and which exterminated some 100 million people in the past century.

So please, how is the BNP more "extreme" than a party which sings "We'll keep the Red Flag Flying Here", whose senior members constantly went on junkets to the old Soviet Bloc, and which is opposed to a traditional Britain in every possible aspect?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by The Bear:
In the context and form that it is written about by alfred the 'great' it is.

You are falling for the doctrine that anyone who questions this countries immigration policy is racist.

The conservatives policy of keeping quiet about anything that might label them the 'nasty party' is very wrong. You have finally surrended to the left wing agender of 'no go areas'.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by The Bear:
In the context and form that it is written about by alfred the 'great' it is.

So is immigration a 'no go area' for discussion?
Or is it only a 'no go area' with alfred the great?

How do you decide when it is or isn't a topic for rational debate?
Or is it not up for discussion at all, in any way shape or form, as far as you are concerned?

If you have no interest in the debate about immigration that is your prerogative, but maybe it is a little high handed to think that others should think likewise.
[Rep]

I've got no problem with immigration being discussed, it's a very important issue for us, what I DO have an issue with is the use of the immigration card in order to push racist doctrine.
[Rep]