European Citizen 09:38 PM 26-10-2008
Originally Posted by david H:
What is racist about opposing the Communist invasion of Hungary in 1956 and the EU, now? Tom you are trying to hard.
Except the EU didn't invade Hungary. There's a key difference for you.
[Rep]
Charlemagne 09:46 PM 26-10-2008
Originally Posted by Vortex:
Its also full of West Indians who probably dislike your Somalians more than anyone else.:-)
Thats true. Africans and West Indians have trouble getting on. If anything they is more racism between those two groups than there is between whites and blacks.
[Rep]
g hall 06:26 PM 27-10-2008
Originally Posted by European Citizen:
Except the EU didn't invade Hungary. There's a key difference for you.
Yep money talks wait to they become net contributors
[Rep]
g hall 06:28 PM 27-10-2008
Originally Posted by Charlemagne:
Thats true. Africans and West Indians have trouble getting on. If anything they is more racism between those two groups than there is between whites and blacks.
Don't generalise - what you mean is that many tribes (not races) don't get on - colour is a convenient way for simpletons to differentiate between tribes but it is more then skin deep lol
a good example go to Swansea and state you're a Cardiff City fan then RLF
[Rep]
Wowbanger TIP 01:07 AM 28-10-2008
Originally Posted by European Citizen:
Except the EU didn't invade Hungary. There's a key difference for you.
How about Serbia?
[Rep]
Vortex 08:24 PM 28-10-2008
Originally Posted by Wowbanger TIP:
How about Serbia?
When people don't reply to a point someone made Spencer, you know you have won the argument. To confirm Serbia is a very apt example.
:-)
[Rep]
London Orbital 05:33 AM 29-10-2008
Originally Posted by Charlemagne:
Thats true. Africans and West Indians have trouble getting on. If anything they is more racism between those two groups than there is between whites and blacks.
Where do you stand on the West Indian/Somalian divide then?
Welcome the Somalians with too-open arms and you might have Afro-Caribbean hostility to deal with.
They might even see you as being somewhat 'racist' towards them.
For 'racism' is in the eye of the beholder, after all - there's no justice in the accusation.
And they have been here a mite longer than the latest bunch of East African asylum seekers.
[Rep]
Charlemagne 04:59 PM 29-10-2008
Originally Posted by London Orbital:
Where do you stand on the West Indian/Somalian divide then?
Welcome the Somalians with too-open arms and you might have Afro-Caribbean hostility to deal with.
There is already hostility between the various ethnic groups. What we have to do is simply be fair and even handed in our treatment.
[Rep]
British-Conservatism 05:08 PM 29-10-2008
Originally Posted by Charlemagne:
There is already hostility between the various ethnic groups. What we have to do is simply be fair and even handed in our treatment.
The joys of multiracialism eh.
How will your coffee coloured overman perform against these Black immigrants then Charlemagne?
[Rep]
Charlemagne 05:11 PM 29-10-2008
Originally Posted by British-Conservatism:
The joys of multiracialism eh.
How will your coffee coloured overman perform against these Black immigrants then Charlemagne?
London is the most successful city in the UK. Not suprising since more than a third of it's population is foreign born.
Immigrants have been successfully assimilated before and will continue to be.
[Rep]