I must bring to the moderators’ attention a forum member by the name of Danny, who is exhibiting behaviour inappropriate to this forum.

During April/May he launched attack after attack upon the English Democrats Party, while supporting the Free England Party (I believe at one time he considered joining). Then all a sudden he switched sides to praise the EDP, while attacking the Free England Party. Examples are attached;

17-05-2008, 02:22 PM
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/free...prorities.html

Originally Posted by Danny:
Are you going to tell the forum Mr Constantine of your young free England youth set up.Should be Interesting for Forum members to know the back ground of the helpers and there links.Took me a little time to work you out Constantine I sadly was taken in by you but not anymore.London UKIP aslo Mr Constantine like to answer questions of some things forum members would like to know about your antics.?Perhaps now Instead of coming across as this touchy feely polite Mr Nice guy you could answer the other thread up for discussion or are you to afraid of further evidence of truth coming out about yourself and others in FEP.I look forward to debating with you Mr Constanstine Mr Atkins and Mr Thompson and If hes still around lord lucan from Derbyshire.

Now what is he inferring when he mentions the youth setup?

And this:

19-05-2008, 02:17 PM
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/free...-connor-2.html

[quote=Danny;502557]Thank you for the comments anglo staffs.It is to expose Constantine and other things in relation to FEP.Constantine is not what people think he is on here he comes across as this polite nice Mr nice guy.when it fact he is the total opposite.I will let forum members and general members of the public and the media who veiw this forum to make there own minds up,I was taken in by Atkins and Constantine and CO (FEP)As have people like the Ea of dune who still has as has hartlepool who still has.I look forward to when the timing is right to see there faces when myself and others post what we know about helpers of the young free england wing and there links Atkins denies it and says come on big boy.He is going to look so so silly when he sees the stuff this person was in political bed with.[/QUOTE

He then left the forum for two months, possibly to gather his evidence against us, then resurfaced in July with this:

20-07-2008, 01:19 PM
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/free...tish-yoke.html

Originally Posted by Danny:
Sorry no can do Atkins constantine and you Mr clueless thompson are in for a rough ride.There are things that have had to be checked for legal stuff and emails that are being checked.Myself and others are not daft enough to post things before having the approval of people which have contacted us.we need there permission before doing so.Ignore my posts which you should be doing you are not worried so just ignore me.

More threats, but still no evidence of course. While questioning him on his switching of sides, he apparently only opposed the EDP because of their anti-Scottish posters during the London election campaign. Fair enough, but what have we done to incur his wrath? You only have to take a cursory look at his postings during May, July and August to see the persistent nature of his attacks.

But what is this about? There are 6 other sections for political parties. We never see the same level of attacks against them. Does he think because we are the smallest and newest of these parties that somehow he can use this forum to destroy us? When I say ‘us’, there are only 3 of us who regularly post on this forum, so he is attacking the individual members as much as the party.

This should be a forum for debate, not a vehicle for personal vendettas. This person neither contributes to debates anyway. We found out early on that every time we answered one of his questions, he would just ignore it and continue with another line of attack. Then when we stopped debating, he would insult us for not debating with him!

I can only ask the moderators to consider the evidence, then ban him, because the longer he remains a forum member, the more he compromises the integrity of this forum.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Northumbrian:
I must bring to the moderators’ attention a forum member by the name of Danny, who is exhibiting behaviour inappropriate to this forum.

is your opinion.

Originally Posted by Northumbrian:
During April/May he launched attack after attack upon the English Democrats Party, while supporting the Free England Party (I believe at one time he considered joining). Then all a sudden he switched sides to praise the EDP, while attacking the Free England Party.

And?

Originally Posted by Northumbrian:
Now what is he inferring when he mentions the youth setup?.

who knows. We don't ban people for 'inferring'.

Originally Posted by Northumbrian:
There are 6 other sections for political parties. We never see the same level of attacks against them. Does he think because we are the smallest and newest of these parties that somehow he can use this forum to destroy us? When I say ‘us’, there are only 3 of us who regularly post on this forum, so he is attacking the individual members as much as the party.

You choose to post here. If there are only three of you - what of it? Has absolutely nothing ot do with the case in point.

Originally Posted by Northumbrian:
This should be a forum for debate, not a vehicle for personal vendettas. This person neither contributes to debates anyway. We found out early on that every time we answered one of his questions, he would just ignore it and continue with another line of attack. Then when we stopped debating, he would insult us for not debating with him!

Agreed that this is a forum for debate. However, as yet Danny has not broken any forum rules as far as I can see. Why don't you just ignore him?

Summary - complaint not upheld. Regardless of your views on 'danny' - he has not yet broken any forum rules.
[Rep]

Really? Well you'll have to tell him to stop whinging when I treat him with the contempt he deserves.

After all, if it's in the forum rules....
[Rep]

The moderators agenda is to harm the FEP. They claim to be libertarians and see an English revival as dangerous as their view is a negative one about our history. They are opposed to nationalism and because their self-m image is of being nopposed to prejudice they allow others like Cassie and Danny to harm manifestations of the English spirit and thus maintain their llusion of beinbg above prejudice. To put it in simple terms, despite their own rules and even though they gave the FEP the thread,the moderators are deliberately allowing this to continue to harm the FEP .
[Rep]

Originally Posted by david H:
The moderators agenda is to harm the FEP. They claim to be libertarians and see an English revival as dangerous as their view is a negative one about our history. They are opposed to nationalism and because their self-m image is of being nopposed to prejudice they allow others like Cassie and Danny to harm manifestations of the English spirit and thus maintain their llusion of beinbg above prejudice. To put it in simple terms, despite their own rules and even though they gave the FEP the thread,the moderators are deliberately allowing this to continue to harm the FEP .

Moderators moderate content posted by others. If danny breaks the rules, he will be sanctioned. As yet, he hasn't. Equally, you are free to refute his arguments. Which leaves you with two choices:-
1) Go somewhere else.
2) Shut up.

However, a word of warning seems in order. Don't start on the mod/admins. we have no agenda except to manage a well run forum and sanction those who break the rules - but we don't take kindly to posters trying to put an unwarranted spin on when we are just trying to do our job. We gave the FEP their own space, and to an extent what you do with it is up to you - all we do is watch for things such as personal insults.

Frankly, so far my judgement is that giving the FEP their own space has only caused the mod/admins grief. I'd like to be wrong on this, so please deal with danny through making sensible posts in response or ignoring him. Otherwise, I'm tempted to pull the FEP forum and ban the lot of you as more trouble than you're worth.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Northumbrian:
Really? Well you'll have to tell him to stop whinging when I treat him with the contempt he deserves.

After all, if it's in the forum rules....

Correct. No more personal insults though.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by david H:
The moderators agenda is to harm the FEP. They claim to be libertarians and see an English revival as dangerous as their view is a negative one about our history. They are opposed to nationalism and because their self-m image is of being nopposed to prejudice they allow others like Cassie and Danny to harm manifestations of the English spirit and thus maintain their llusion of beinbg above prejudice. To put it in simple terms, despite their own rules and even though they gave the FEP the thread,the moderators are deliberately allowing this to continue to harm the FEP .

I have another idea, ban the whining English nutters, all of them. When i say 'all' I mean about 5 people which is nearly as many votes as they can expect at the polls.

This forum is their only real voice as no-one vists their pathetic sites.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Captain Nasty:
I have another idea, ban the whining English nutters, all of them. When i say 'all' I mean about 5 people which is nearly as many votes as they can expect at the polls.

This forum is their only real voice as no-one vists their pathetic sites.

Isn't it peculiar how Englishmen seem to be the most troubled by English nationalists?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by david H:
The moderators agenda is to harm the FEP.

You keep claiming that we're out to harm "nationalists" and now apparently all our efforts are directed at harming a microparty, the FEP. Why on earth would we wish to harm them?

If we were truly out to harm them, would Anthony have created an area specifically for the FEP?
[Rep]

Well you've let someone keep issuing threats against us for the last 3 months. We know he's a little potty and this 'evidence' he talks about is made up - but it doesn't exactly look good for any casual observer of this site.
And I'm not aware of the other 6 political parties on this site having to put up with someone like that.
[Rep]