Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
Sadly not but UKIP won't mind that as they too endorse the forced genocide of the British people along with all the other Establishment parties.

Forced genocide? Please explain. I don't see UKIP endorsing anything of the sort. Do you understand the definitions of the words "forced" and "genocide", or is it just a BNP robot cliché which you've picked up from Griffin's rantings and are now repeating like a parrot?

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
UKIP supporters must hate themselves seeing as their party is composed of about 99% white Britons.

Er... proof?!
[Rep]

Forced genocide as in continuing MASS, uncontrolled immigration which has no real democratic mandate and never has done. The UN would define it as such in that it has led to "condidtions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of an ethinc group". Do you really think our 'leaders' don't know what they are doing? They do and it is EVIL.


As for your second point, do you concede that very few ethnics belong to UKIP and that its membership is overwhemingly white and mostly elderly as well?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by HM:
Forced genocide? Please explain. I don't see UKIP endorsing anything of the sort. Do you understand the definitions of the words "forced" and "genocide", or is it just a BNP robot cliché which you've picked up from Griffin's rantings and are now repeating like a parrot?



Er... proof?!

Originally Posted by :
Dictionary.com Unabridged
–noun the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.

Over the last sixty or so years immigration into Britain has served to reduce the indigenous population, or prevent it reaching the rates of growth which it could have in the absence of migration. The effect of this varies in extent from place to place. In the case of my home city, Birmingham, the indigenous population has declined from about 1 million immediately after the Second World War to less than 600,000 today (according to government figures, almost certainly underestimated). A population loss of 40% so far, a figure which is comparable with the worst genocides in history. In the process dozens of indigenous communities, some of them centuries old, have been almost completely eradicated. This is ethnic cleansing, pure and simple.

Birmingham is by no means the worst example, at a conservative estimate three million indigenous Britons have been ethnically cleansed from London. There are at least six million none indigenous peoples in the UK, every one of them taking the place of indigenous Briton making the British Holocaust of an equal magnitude to that of the Jews in the Second World War.

Genocide is distinct from mere mass murder not because of the methods used but by the effect. The clearance of indigenous peoples in the Americas and Australia are rightly considered genocides though most of the millions of causalities died as an indirect result of being economically disempowed (losing control of the lands required to sustain them) not direct physical assault. Moreover had these been mere classical genocides they would have been temporary "mortality events" as demographers like to call them, no different to the Black Death or the World Wars. However because the method of economic genocide is far more effective they were unable to rebuild their societies or replace their lost populations. This is precisely what is happening in the UK.

The final element in identifying the demographic pattern within the UK as genocide is "intent". It has to be deliberate. And of course it is. Ask any politician why Britain needs mass migration and he will tell you "to provide a unskilled low pay poor conditions workforce" (what ever happened to the "knowledge economy"?) or as they put it "its economically necessary". Exactly the "economic" argument put forward during the appropriation of the indigenous American and Australian lands. Incidentally by the exact same people, the British elite. They no more care about the indigenous British now than they did the unfortunate indigenous populations which got in the way of their plantations in the days of yore. And they are equally as prepared to see the British people go the same way.

True there has been relatively few deaths compared to classical genocides. But this is irrelevant to the definition of the concept. History tells us that populations generally expand to fill the "carrying capacity" of the economy. Effectively the importation of economic units reduces the economic resources available to support families and therefore reduces the birth rate. In the UK this has resulted in millions of British people never even getting a chance of life. Even the victims of classical genocide at least had a chance to live before their fate, the victims of the British holocaust never even got that much.

I believe this is how future generations of Britions will regard this period in our history. One day every major cross roads in every British town will have a prominently marked grave of some genocidal traitor so that passers by can spit on it and to serve as a warning of the consequence of treason and evil.

If your lucky enough to be around then HM and your grandkids ask you why you did nothing to stop this crime against humanity I suggest you tell them "I didn't know". It worked for the Germans after all.
[Rep]

Very wellsaid, Wowbanger TIP. UKIP supporters/sympathisers make me laugh at their sheer political naivity in that they actually believe the politicians of the Lib/Lab/Con party have any regard at all for the native population of Britain and that mass immigration is just an accident or is as natural as the sun rising every morning! Our politicans of the liberal-left Establishment KNOW JOLLY WELL WHAT THEY ARE DOING!
[Rep]

Originally Posted by HM:
imams



Graffiti



CDs



Because it is the only way for them to relieve the stress of the BNP knocking on their doors and bombarding them with hate leaflets 24/7



War memorials are usually engraved in stone. Hard for engraving to peel, but I digress.



She isn't New Labour.

As da' yoof would say, 'spect man! :-)
[Rep]