Japan DOES effectively ban immigration (unless you call the immigration of a couple of thousand people a year as immigration).



We as a country had better get to it on the second point then but we never will unless immigration is stopped first as this is the excuse big business in Britain has had since the war for not investing in new machinery ect and to their eternal shame British governments haven't stood-up to them. The BNP will reintroduce selection into the school system and thereby the grammar schools will be restored.



What is EDP policy on this subject then? The fact is the EDP is obsessed with another tier of government that ISN'T needed.


I see the EDP go along with the Tories and UKIP in castigating all the unemployed as feckless and lazy layabouts who won't do any work. It is strange that Britain had a very high employment rate before WW2 when there was practically no immigration at all. We need to stop immigration first then at least the small minority of the unemployed who are lazy won't be able to use the excuse which many of them do now that the 'the Poles have taken the jobs' or that an employer would prefer to employ a Pole instead of a Briton.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Hartlepool:
The bnp have to be all raving mad,how can you expect to reach your goal of an all white Britain?

Are you aware that no country in the world is all white and that the white people of Britain would never allow the bnp to make it all white.

You are a mad minority in this country,you need to go somewhere else to try your ideals out,try Cameroon or Saudi Arabia,maybe you could get a Government grant?

A bnp free country is not far away now their membership is rapidly declining and finances are about spent,who would want to join such a silly group of persons?

Membership is rapidly declining, is it? Says who? If the finances are ''spent' then how comes the BNP is contesting every major set of elections?


No country in the world is all-white but there are all-asian countries but I suppose like the liberal you are you view only white people as 'racist'?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
Japan DOES effectively ban immigration (unless you call the immigration of a couple of thousand people a year as immigration).

Yeh right. 1.7 million foreign workers in Japan according to this:

HURIGHTS OSAKA - Migrant workers in Japan

Anyway, I'm not defending the EDP's policy on immigration, but to suggest your party has the answer is a bit far-fetched.
[Rep]

The BNP has more of a robust stance on this issue than many others and it is a principled one which is more than can be said for the Conservative Party who only make NOISES about the issue but when in government the action is sadly mostly lacking.


By the way, the Japanese government refuse to grant them citizenship thereby retaining the special nature of citizenship (unlike British governments who hand out our citizenship like confetti at a wedding) and also many of these foreign workers have to register with the police and give fingerprints every month to the police. The Japs regard them as 'gajin' which translates as 'outsider'. I have never heard Gordon Brown or any other British leftie call for sanctions to be placed on such an nasty and 'Nazi' country!
[Rep]

I agree with that approach to citizenship. It's perfectly feasible to have a policy of not granting citizenship to foreigners. But for zero immigration - unlikely...
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
First of all define what you mean by 'racist'? Very often that term is just a term of political abuse used by liberals who don't have an argument so they throw it around in the hope that those who they are using it against just shut-up.


All I am doing along with other BNP supporters is to highlight the differences between the BNP and the EDP. What is wrong with that?

Oh really? You've lost touch with reality! Here are your previous posts here:

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
Precisely. What genuine English nationalist believes that it is ok for native Englishmen and women to become outnumbered in cities such as Leicester and Birmingham in the next few years ect? I think some of the problem with the EDP is the way they put across their points. That London election broadcast was quite frankly a disgrace with its childish anti-Scottish rant by Matt O'Connor.

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
Their anti-BNP rant after their debacle at Sedgefield was quite a laugh! I can't wait for the next installment!

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
Precisely which is what all this forty-two day detention thing is about. If we had no muslim extremists in Britain then traditional British freedoms would be easier to defend.

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
It might well be English in origin but that is of no consequence now. In 2008, these are British freedoms as Mr Davis rightly pointed-out and they are under threat not only from the Labour government but by the EU and Mr Davis should mention this but he won't because that subject is no go area for the Tories.

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
The EDP candidate only gained that number of votes because this WASN'T a normal by-election. I suspect a few Liberal Democrats or Labour voters voted for the EDP which if their own parties had stood they wouldn't have done. If UKIP had stood, you would have been blown out of the water AGAIN!

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
It isn't 'bile'. It is merely observance of the facts. UKIP normally do blow the EDP out of the water. Haltemprice and Howden was a very untypical by-election and I am sure the next by-election with an EDP candidate will bear that out.

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
I am not at school and haven't been for some time. You still got beaten by the Greens even with two out of three major party candidates not standing and no UKIP or BNP candidates standing - both bigger and more well-supported 'minor parties' than the ED's are.

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
The BNP didn't stand because they agree with Mr Davis. I don't see why traditional British freedoms should go down the plughole just because Labour and the Tories continue with their INSANE policy of mass immigration and in particular mass MUSLIM immigration which is why we 'need' this curtailment of our freedoms in order to deal with the growing threat of internal terrorism.

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
No, they wouldn't. Unlike the Establishment parties, the BNP has no need to shut people up with oppressive laws like the others have all passed onto the statute book.

Originally Posted by Independence Now!:
I regard the EDP as an Establishment party in so far as they don't recognise the true gravity of the mass immigration/asylum situation and don't have the resolute policies (unlike the BNP) to deal with this.

You talk tripe, and make it up as you go along, shifting from one dubious position to another!!


--
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Richard the Lionheart:
The sooner they give up campaigning on Barnett and an EP, and focus on the concerns that people have, they might stand a better chance of electoral success. The Tilbrook/Constable dream team simply isn't working and the ordinary EDP member should now seriously consider getting rid of them.

What's his name? I'll send him a leaflet. :-)

(I'm sorry - cheap shot, I know, but I couldn't resist! )
[Rep]