I apologise to the English Democrats for posting here but I thought this would be the best place to draw attention to a blantantly anti-English matter.

I have been shown an advert for a fragrance for men called 'Filthy English', that appeared in the London Times newspaper on 22nd July. That was five days ago and I have seen no public outcry about it. Presumably that shows the typical English sangfroid or simply that the English don't mind being called filthy.

Had the fragrance used any other ethnic title, all hell would have broken out with the management of the Times being arrested, the printers going on strike, demonstrations outside the Times office and a call for a boycott of that newspaper.

What a sorry bunch the English have now become that they accept the description, or nobody ever reads the adverts in the Times.
[Rep]

You are right. We are cowed and apologise for ourselves. We think we are bad and deserve to be abused - all inculcated by our worthless rulers. As Paul Gottfried says in "After Liberalism" our students know little about their culture about everyone in history we have wronged. The elites rule by instilling guilt into the English.
Ask anyone in the wider public if they are English and they bwcome embarrassed and emphasise that they have forebeats or relatives from some other group like Irish. Many English nationalists are cowards and pretend that all the ethnic groups are as English as us so they do not have to face awkward issues.
[Rep]

Do you have a link for the advert? I have just googled these -

Filthy English ******* 3 (2005) (V)

Waterstones.com: Fiction: Filthy English by Jonathan Meades (2003)
[Rep]

It goes well together with that other description that irks me to death, "dirty blond hair".
[Rep]

The picture on this is the same as the advert.

Juicy Couture Dirty English for men ~ fragrance review :: Now Smell This
[Rep]

It is also an example of how commerce is pushing feminisation. Simple people think this is part of gaining rights for gays and the transgenderd. In fact it is being manipulated for the greater profits to be made if they can manipulate men into wearing make-up and perfume.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by gumshoe:
I apologise to the English Democrats for posting here but I thought this would be the best place to draw attention to a blantantly anti-English matter.

I have been shown an advert for a fragrance for men called 'Filthy English', that appeared in the London Times newspaper on 22nd July. That was five days ago and I have seen no public outcry about it. Presumably that shows the typical English sangfroid or simply that the English don't mind being called filthy.

Had the fragrance used any other ethnic title, all hell would have broken out with the management of the Times being arrested, the printers going on strike, demonstrations outside the Times office and a call for a boycott of that newspaper.

What a sorry bunch the English have now become that they accept the description, or nobody ever reads the adverts in the Times.

What do your regard yourself as first and foremost?


___________________
[Rep]

Bet you didn't even consider complaining to the appropriate authorities, or the company who make it.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by cassie:
What do your regard yourself as first and foremost?


___________________

I regard myself as English without the Filthy; and tomorrow I shall be contacting the Times and the agencies connected with advertising standards and race relations about the offending advert.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by gumshoe:
I regard myself as English without the Filthy; and tomorrow I shall be contacting the Times and the agencies connected with advertising standards and race relations about the offending advert.

Well, that is an excellent response! :-)

_
[Rep]