I do not understand why Danny posts here, he contributes nothing to any debates, says he has a stack of evidence that will cause damage to our party. I say there is no evidence and I challenge Danny to cite his evidence or shut up.
As to his earlier claim that people from the forum sent him PMs in support of his campaign against Free England, I can think of no one who has a problem with Free England or its members, except Danny's sidekick Bonnie Dundee. You are quite wrong Bonnie Dundee about not being able to track down an internet user, it can be done.
I suggest Free England members and supporters simply ignore Danny's posts as he has proved himself time and again a total irrelevance and it is a waste of time to argue with him. Every time he makes his threats and accusations I will report him through the correct channels.
[Rep]
SilverFalcon 03:50 PM 22-07-2008
I don't know about you lot, but I'm bored.
Back to the yoke of the matter: There seems to be a schism between those who see themselves as "British" and those who are English. Could this be because those who say they are British are worried that an independent England may give them a hard time, practise discrimination against them, etc? Do they feel the same way about an independent Scotland?
Perhaps they wouldn't feel quite so worried, or need to cluster under a fading, and in places disintegrating, banner if they knew what Fee England would be like for those who see themselves as "British".
And if they knew what it would be like to be protected within this fortress instead of stuck out on the fringes of the EuroZone.
[Rep]
Northumbrian 05:45 PM 22-07-2008
Originally Posted by Danny:
Bonnie Dundee has never said he supports me.Hes asked a question Mr Lionheart it seems you dont like people asking questions or people having the nerve to stand up to you.And no cassie and Mr constantine odd bedfellows those two given your history of Mr constantine leading the case for having you expelled from EDP. I am, not in new labour you will be held to account.You wont bounce me off this forum with your silly big brother well gang up on him antics.I and others will hold you to account.This is a public forum for general members of the public stop acting as if you own the forum and think you can moderate what can and cant be said or posted.THIS IS NOT A FREE ENGLAND PARTY FORUM
Held to account in what way?
What's the plan? By keep saying there's something dodgy about the Free England Party people will start to believe you? Doesn't work that way.
And the longer you keep repeating yourself the more ridiculous you become.
[Rep]
Danny 05:54 PM 22-07-2008
Originally Posted by Northumbrian:
Held to account in what way?
What's the plan? By keep saying there's something dodgy about the Free England Party people will start to believe you? Doesn't work that way.
And the longer you keep repeating yourself the more ridiculous you become.
Political parties and there membership are there to be held to account in lots of ways.Its easy to understand.You are an NEC member of a political party even you should understand what it means.
[Rep]
Northumbrian 05:59 PM 22-07-2008
You must be busy then. There are around 300 political parties. Do you spend all your time working at ways on how to hold them to account?
[Rep]
gumshoe 09:22 PM 22-07-2008
[quote=Andrew Constantine;525911]One of the most enduring threads in English radicalism has been how we should overthrow the 'Norman Yoke' and counter its role in destroying the free institutions of England. QUOTE] - So states the party leader in his return to this forum.
What the hell have the Normans got to do with anything today? I can't think of anybody who wakes up in the morning and says, 'Darling, do you think to day is the day for countering the Norman yoke?'
Granted, there is a problem with Britishness, but if Andrew Constantine's new party is going anywhere he had better move forward several hundred years from Saxons and Normans. Even mentioning the Normans puts his party in a league apart from voters who are concerned with every day issues such as negative equity.
[Rep]
Wessexman 12:17 AM 23-07-2008
Originally Posted by Andrew Constantine:
The UKIP members of this forum will be accept that the British are the vast majority of the establishment, politicians, political party members, civil servants of the UK - and yet we are still ruled by Brussels.
Because you allow yourself to be. It is a rather different, situation although not so different so far, but it is still up to the gov't to allow most of this.
Originally Posted by :
The EU relies on directly controlling the main laws within member states via the treaty of Rome, and the courts via the ECJ. The cleverness of the builders of the European super state was to see the simplicity and ease in gaining power by subordinating national governments to the Commission, so the officialdom of each national state does its bidding.
No actually that is ********. For now it relies on the people and gov't of the member nations accepting such laws and jurisdiction. If the EU were a superstate it might be different but the English would not be the vast majority in most things then.
Originally Posted by :
When the English (not Brown, not Darling, not Cameron, not Kennedy, not Hain, not Howard, not Duncan Smith, etc) take back power in England, we will do so to revive the English national state - and that means real independence from the other home nations and getting out of the EU.
What does this and the dodgy analogies have to do with my point?
[Rep]
Wessexman 12:21 AM 23-07-2008
Originally Posted by SilverFalcon:
I don't know about you lot, but I'm bored.
Back to the yoke of the matter: There seems to be a schism between those who see themselves as "British" and those who are English. Could this be because those who say they are British are worried that an independent England may give them a hard time, practise discrimination against them, etc? Do they feel the same way about an independent Scotland?
Perhaps they wouldn't feel quite so worried, or need to cluster under a fading, and in places disintegrating, banner if they knew what Fee England would be like for those who see themselves as "British".
And if they knew what it would be like to be protected within this fortress instead of stuck out on the fringes of the EuroZone.
There is a schism between hysterical people who want to use projectionism against the Scottish and Welsh and pretend, despite the English being the vast majority in everything from the electorate to the civil service, and pretend they are the real rulers and "oppressors" of the English ie the British and those do don't believe this ****.
The British is just code for Welsh, Scots, Cornish and perhaps a few Englishmen they don't like who are supposed to be "oppressing" England. kind of ironic if think about history.
Obviously as a Scot and Cornishman I take acception to this blatant protectionism, and get rather annoyed at a cause I might well support otherwise(although I prefer regionalists.).
Of course that is not all them, a few are more sensible. Richard has seemed quite sensible in the past.
[Rep]
Wessexman 12:24 AM 23-07-2008
Originally Posted by :
can think of no one who has a problem with Free England or its members, except Danny's sidekick Bonnie Dundee. You are quite wrong Bonnie Dundee about not being able to track down an internet user, it can be done.
Right, I'm his sidekick because I can't see the threats that don't exist in his posts.
The mods must be his sidekicks as well because they threw out your silly complaints.
[Rep]
Wessexman 12:26 AM 23-07-2008
Originally Posted by Richard the Lionheart:
Bonnie Dundee, I am shocked by your support of this creature. I suggest you read back on some of his postings before you offer your support.
If this is so why have you not reported it?
I have seen what you have reported and it was nothing and the mods were right to throw it out.
Perhaps there is more but it seems strange you haven't reported it.
[Rep]