Originally Posted by Andrew Constantine:
RTL

I liked your responses.

There are broadly two classes of folks who post on this forum.

The great majority [Have you actually counted them all? No? More hyperbole to bolster a feeble claim!] of this forum's members have sincere and positive views, wish to improve matters, and work hard to build their respective parties up. Whatever their party, I respect their patriotism and hard work. [Yeah! They're all on your side and opposed to me! What kind of person needs this kind of psychological crutch!]

Then there is this small minority of ... social misfits, who do not get on with their fellow men and who take refuge in decrying the hard work of others.[No facts here because our Andrew cannot cite any!] Some of these are sad men with nothing better to do, but a few are simply idle layabouts living on public welfare, [Just who are these individuals on public welfare? I think we should be told! Andrew cannot give particulars, because this is just another product of his fevered mind!] who hate to see others working to improve the common good.[No facts here, because our Andrew cannot cite any!] They say of course that in trying to undermine our patriotic parties, they are simply 'holding public figures to account', or some such nonsense. Well, be damned with them! [Now just who has actually said: "I am undermining patriotic parties simply to hold public figures to account"? More nonsense from Andrew's troubled mind!]

Regards, Andrew

Ah! Yet another generalised and sanctimonious sermon from someone who, despite his protestations, is guilty of that of which he complains! This is the 'social fit' who was first a member of UKIP, then a member of the EDP and now has registered his own party on account of having got on so well with others . . . all within the space of two years!

The man who, in collaboration with Steven Uncles, contrived to have me first removed as EDP National Secretary and subsequently from membership without a hearing and without any particulars my alleged offences having been properly notified to me in writing either before or since! Then, within six months, flounced out of the EDP on a point of principle suddenly discovered!

Yes, the collaborator is the same Steven Uncles who, alleged to have committed an offence of harassment, has since been arrested!

You really ought to wind your neck in! Anyone - yes ANYONE - reading this thread alone can see what a preternaturally touchy person you are!

I suggest that you: (1) put me on your 'ignore list' (you'll feel so much better for this negative [oops, it'll be 'positive' in your mind! :-)] action; and (2) get on with drafting your full constitution [not to be confused with the minimal one required by law] and rule book!

So, having contrived to have me removed from the EDP, what positive 'work' would you have me do? You won't answer this, because you can't answer this! Like so many of your words, your words about this are hollow and largely meaningless! What a recommendation for a would-be political leader. [Mind you, I suppose there are some who would regard these as suitable characteristics!]

Cheers!

PS I bet you don't like this response! :-) :-)



_____________________
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Richard the Lionheart:
Have you and Danny formed an alliance, the anti-Free England Party? :-)

Really please tell us all about this Alliance.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Andrew Constantine:
RTL

I liked your responses.

There are broadly two classes of folks who post on this forum.

The great majority of this forum's members have sincere and positive views, wish to improve matters, and work hard to build their respective parties up. Whatever their party, I respect their patriotism and hard work.

Then there is this small minority of ... social misfits, who do not get on with their fellow men and who take refuge in decrying the hard work of others. Some of these are sad men with nothing better to do, but a few are simply idle layabouts living on public welfare, who hate to see others working to improve the common good. They say of course that in trying to undermine our patriotic parties, they are simply 'holding public figures to account', or some such nonsense. Well, be damned with them!

Regards, Andrew

This statement is shocking coming from a leader of political party.I totally condemn it and salute the good decent people who post on this forum and the good public who log on and observe.This statement is BOTH INSULTING and a DISGRACE.You should be ashamed of yourself
[Rep]

Shocking???

Do you think if you'd issued threats to Gordon Brown or David Cameron, that they'd want to hold debates with you?

You think it's shocking coming from the leader of a political party? Have you ever discussed anything with any other political party leaders? I doubt it very much, because I doubt you'd be able to approach them. Go on - try it...
[Rep]

Oh I thought that the last poster on this thread said that they had put me on his Ignore list:-) list seems like he just cant stop Ignoring me.Hello Northumbrian :-)quote
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Andrew Constantine:
RTL

I liked your responses.

There are broadly two classes of folks who post on this forum.

The great majority of this forum's members have sincere and positive views, wish to improve matters, and work hard to build their respective parties up. Whatever their party, I respect their patriotism and hard work.

Then there is this small minority of ... social misfits, who do not get on with their fellow men and who take refuge in decrying the hard work of others. Some of these are sad men with nothing better to do, but a few are simply idle layabouts living on public welfare, who hate to see others working to improve the common good. They say of course that in trying to undermine our patriotic parties, they are simply 'holding public figures to account', or some such nonsense. Well, be damned with them!

Regards, Andrew

This post reveals much about its author who presumes, without adducing a shred of objective evidence, to classify those who post on this forum in order to bolster his own ego.

According to Andrew, there are 'broadly' two classes. The first, comprises more than 2,450 members having 'sincere and positive views, wish to improve matters and work hard to build their respective parties up'! Would it be unreasonable to conclude that Andrew regards himself as being in this virtuous class? From this we can conclude that anyone without a party cannot be within this class. So there you have it, all you non-joiners [and we know who many of you are - I could list a number myself!], you must be in the other 'broad' class!

The second class is to be disparaged as much as possible. First, they are not merely a minority, but a 'small minority'.

Second, they are 'social misfits' . . . well they must be, they offer opinions with which Andrew disagrees! [Incidentally, anyone encountered a 'social misfit' who does get on with his fellow man? Bit of tautology here in the cause of emphasising how reprehensible these individuals are.]

Third, some [but, apparently, not all] of this 'small minority of social misfits' are "sad men with nothing better to do". Unfortunately, Andrew's emotional outburst omits to tell us either what they do or what they have nothing better to do????

Fourth, "a few of some of this small minority" are really to be deprecated - allegedly they are "simply idle lay-abouts living on public welfare"! The obvious implications here are: (1) this undefined 'public welfare' is invariably reprehensible; and (2) that those on 'public welfare' are ALL 'idle lay-abouts'!

Fifth, presuming to see into the minds of this "few of some of the small minority", Andrew informs us that they "hate to see others working for the common good" whatever that presumed 'common good' may be!

Well Andrew, you may think that, overcome by a desire to expound your prejudiced and prejudicial, sanctimonious opinions, that you come across as a 'good fella', but you don't. Your conduct gives the lie to that! In all my career, I have never treated [or been party to the treatment of] anyone the way in which you treated me. Indeed, as I have told you, your actions fell very short of the code of conduct set out by your professional institute. [I say this as someone who had considerable experience in what is now known as human resources and industrial relations, which included appearing before the CAC, Industrial Tribunals, the Certification Officer and the EAT.]

If you were wise, you'd keep on the right side of me. One day, you might be fortunate enough to be prominent in the public's consciousness - in the context of elections perhaps? If you continue to rub me up in the wrong way, I'll increasingly see it as my public duty to ensure your behaviour is made known as widely as possible.

My advice to you, as the would-be leader of a political party, is to contain such opinions. Otherwise, by association, you convey the image of the FEP being a nasty party. In other words, your cure might well be seen as being worse than England's current condition!


______________________________
[Rep]

Do you get on with your fellow man, cassie? Or is this a bit of the self being projected? Don't respond for that is displacement activity. Sit and contemplate how you get on with other people.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by david H:
Do you get on with your fellow man, cassie? Or is this a bit of the self being projected? Don't respond for that is displacement activity. Sit and contemplate how you get on with other people.

David it really dosnt do you any favours picking fights with people just for the sake of it your last post you really didnt need to post you are trying to provoke a reaction and thats childish and your recent warning suggests you could well start yourself at getting on with people.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by cassie:
If you were wise, you'd keep on the right side of me. One day, you might be fortunate enough to be prominent in the public's consciousness - in the context of elections perhaps? If you continue to rub me up in the wrong way, I'll increasingly see it as my public duty to ensure your behaviour is made known as widely as possible.

______________________________

You know, for a brief moment I thought Danny had posted that. It's becoming increasingly difficult to tell the difference....
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Northumbrian:
You know, for a brief moment I thought Danny had posted that. It's becoming increasingly difficult to tell the difference....

So, you think your mighty, preternaturally touchy leader is incapable of defending himself do you?

Of course, he can always apologise! :-)



---------------------
[Rep]