Yes, but he is praising most of us.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by david H:
Yes, but he is praising most of us.

David please read over the statement again and you will see that he is Insulting the vast majority of forum members.And if he had any shred of decency he the FEP leader would publicly apoligise to forum members his statement is a DISGRACE and silverfalcon who has publicly supported Constantines statement should be ashamed of herself and anybody else who supports such a statement should hang there heads in shame.Over to you David do you support the FEP leaders statement YES OR NO.?
[Rep]

Which party do you support? Then I'll tell ya!
[Rep]

Originally Posted by david H:
Which party do you support? Then I'll tell ya!

David I belong to no politcal party now do you support the FEP leaders statement.Quite easy TO ANSWER YES OR NO?.Do you condenm the statement YES or NO.?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Danny:
David please read over the statement again and you will see that he is Insulting the vast majority of forum members.And if he had any shred of decency he the FEP leader would publicly apoligise to forum members his statement is a DISGRACE and silverfalcon who has publicly supported Constantines statement should be ashamed of herself and anybody else who supports such a statement should hang there heads in shame.Over to you David do you support the FEP leaders statement YES OR NO.?

As an independent member of this forum and voter I ask Danny to read the first line of the above quote then compare it to the first line of the Constantine item which he posted at the start of this thread....

"The great majority of this forum's members have sincere and positive views".
Danny.
How do you argue that this is, in your words, "Insulting the vast majority of forum members"?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by ANGLO-STAFFS:
As an independent member of this forum and voter I ask Danny to read the first line of the above quote then compare it to the first line of the Constantine item which he posted at the start of this thread....

"The great majority of this forum's members have sincere and positive views".
Danny.
How do you argue that this is, in your words, "Insulting the vast majority of forum members"?

Anglo Staffs for goodness sake read the statement not extracts which you have picked out.Do you support the FEP leaders statement YES or NO he is Insulting you as well in the statement read it in full not the first sentence which means nothing.ANGLO Staffs you just cant bring yourself to say anything bad about FEP can you a bit like David H.I am afraid neither of you can defend such an appalling and disgracful statement if you do defend such a statement you and David H should hang your heads in shame.
[Rep]

Danny and Independent UKIP have taken it personally and it seems to be the bit about "layabouts". I wonder why this touched a nerve?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by david H:
Danny and Independent UKIP have taken it personally and it seems to be the bit about "layabouts". I wonder why this touched a nerve?

Nearly a very good post for a change David H. I have no idea who Mr Constantine is referring to to if in fact the post created by Danny is a true statement by him. As you have observed any member of this forum could be considered a target of the original post by Danny. I am now a target of it by you, some might consider you a target by Andrew/Danny.

I am inclined to think these topics are worthless and should be deleted by the moderators unless the man himself has something to say about all this.
[Rep]

We're all too ashamed of ourselves to answer. We're all hanging our heads so far down they come out from under our legs and we are gazing at the world backwards. Such is our contrition and our regret. Woe is us. :-)

On a rational level, though, I don't know how much more of this rubbish Mr Constantine is expected to endure. He is the leader of a political party and his integrity is being destroyed by someone else's malicious slander. Surely this isn't acceptable, whether the excuse is made that it may emanate from a mentally deranged individual or individuals or not. That really isn't the point.
[Rep]

The problem is not that insults are growing out of passionate political debate but some clearly unhappy people targetting posters who do debate social and political issues. My objection is the way the moderators allow them to stalk and bait others yet they warn or give infractions to people who overstep the mark in debate. But these people are not in debate they are stifling it. It is purely attacks on personalities for twisted fun.
I suppose the mods think it shows them as tolerant but I think it is a combination of bias against certain posters and viewpoints and weakness. I made the point once that the moderators showed preferential treatment to cassie and others who launch personal attack instead of debate especially against english nationalism. Moderator Alex MaKee told me I would be banned if I said that again! That is a clear denial of my freedom of expression but the trolls are allowed to carry on in complete denial of natural justice.
Incidentally, one or two suggested that I am widely opposed: I have had over 980 visits to my personal profile.
[Rep]