A polite request.

Can C Steam please post the forum rules and point out where it says forum members are FORCED to debate with others. I think this would be of benefit to the forum members so we all know where we stand and can make an informed choice as to whether or not continue to remain members.

Thank you.
[Rep]

Nowhere does it say you have to debate with people - you can choose who or what you wish to debate, Richard.

Please refer to my previous posting - I wrote:-
"If you don't want to debate - then there is no need to continually post statements saying so. Just put people on 'ignore'. C_S>

Specifically in response to your post which simply stated that you did not want to debate with Danny. Which in itself is fine, but there is no need to post such, it adds nothing to the debate and the threads will once again descend into accusation and counter accusation. Just put him on ignore, if it is a problem to you or simply don't respond.

FFS - I'm only trying to help!
[Rep]

C Steam

I'm not suggesting you're being unhelpful, I refer you to a post made by Danny which says:

I do ask Richard the lion heart to fully read C_steams statement.C_steams statement is excellent and you Richard should read it and understand what C_steam is saying.I very much look forward to Debating with Richard the lion heart Northumbrian and Andrew Constantine and FEP supporters in Construtive and Interesting Debates.I fully support C_steams statement however it looks like Richard the lion heart and FEP are not going to obide by C_steams statement which requires THEM to DEBATE THREAD TOPICS AND OBIDE BY THE MODERTORS STATEMENT.I NOW LOOK FORWARD TO THE THREAD TOPIC DEBATES WITH RELISH

I have highlighted the relevant section in bold, can you confirm if this is true or not please?
[Rep]

I wrote:-Any new post which does not contribute to debate (i.e consists of accusation/counter accusation) will be deleted. In extremis the whole thread will be deleted.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Danny:
This is good for debate taken from the FEP website.Questions for FEP to answer

'Devil's advocate' questions about independence


1) How far would it go? Would immigration borders be placed in border zones? It would feel strange needing a passport to enter Scotland.

2) Would it not weaken us militarily? Our armed forces have always worked together well.

3) What would happen to the other nations? A separate PM?

4) What responsibilities and powers would a Council of the Isles have? How large would it be? How much funding would it have?

5) Would there be any change in the role or powers of the monarchy?

Danny, you are supposed to JOIN in the debates you keep saying you want!!!!

In answer to the persons questions which Danny posted.

1) That would depend on if we stayed in the EU. If we stay in then no passports.

2) I imagine that we would stay in NATO.

3) Not bothered what happens to the rump of the UK!

4) Council of the Isles? If it is needed it should be as small and powerless as possible.

5) If the Monarch wishes to stay then, if the people of England agree,so-be-it.
If we have a second English Republic, fine by me.
[Rep]