Originally Posted by UkipHM:
Last time I checked, strong point wasn't one word.

It's late Harris, I've had a hard day at the office, you'll let me off that little typo won't you?:-)
[Rep]

What ever I say on crewe he wont accept it, so just waisting my time typing up a responce.
[Rep]

Back to effect on UKIP of of BNP standing, 2005 records show BNP beating UKIP in also ultra Tory next door Maidenhead. This means for Henley really imaginative punchy & relevant passionate material must be put before electorate to show them why it isnt necessary to vote BNP to get their protest at the big 3 etc represeneted . Intellectual arguments on flat rate tax aint going to make it.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by prober:
Back to effect on UKIP of of BNP standing, 2005 records show BNP beating UKIP in also ultra Tory next door Maidenhead. This means for Henley really imaginative punchy & relevant passionate material must be put before electorate to show them why it isnt necessary to vote BNP to get their protest at the big 3 etc represeneted . Intellectual arguments on flat rate tax aint going to make it.

You're right regarding Maidenhead, but Teresa May has a good personal following there to add a touch of confusion to a credible assessment of the BNP/UKIP performance scenario. Unlike Crewe, where the two main parties squeezed the others out, people will be free to register a protest knowing that the Tory will easily get in. Where that protest goes is the key. It will be interesting.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by prober:
Back to effect on UKIP of of BNP standing, 2005 records show BNP beating UKIP in also ultra Tory next door Maidenhead. This means for Henley really imaginative punchy & relevant passionate material must be put before electorate to show them why it isnt necessary to vote BNP to get their protest at the big 3 etc represeneted . Intellectual arguments on flat rate tax aint going to make it.

The BNP are already into full swing into their campaign, they also have some interesting things planned which may generate some good interest. I feel that the BNP will beat UKIP here, if that does happen then it would add an extra twist to the predictions for the 2009 Euros.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by blueblood1920:
The BNP are already into full swing into their campaign, they also have some interesting things planned which may generate some good interest. I feel that the BNP will beat UKIP here, if that does happen then it would add an extra twist to the predictions for the 2009 Euros.

What are you talking about? The BNP will never strike it big rurally, just face it. They are the party voted for by uneducated racists in the inner city. Wow, they won 150 votes in Chard, it doesn't mean they'll do very well at all here. And at least UKIP have intellectual policies, unlike the BNP's "we hate everyone outside Britain because they're all NON-INDIGENOUS MUSLIM TERRORISTS SO LET'S ECONOMICALLY AND POLITICALLY ISOLATE OURSELVES" type of stuff. Why anyone would register a protest vote for those jesters is beyond me.

And I don't see how in any way at all this result will predict the Euros in 2009? I think maybe you'r trying to comfort yourself with daydreaming here.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by UkipHM:
What are you talking about? The BNP will never strike it big rurally, just face it. They are the party voted for by uneducated racists in the inner city. Wow, they won 150 votes in Chard, it doesn't mean they'll do very well at all here. And at least UKIP have intellectual policies, unlike the BNP's "we hate everyone outside Britain because they're all NON-INDIGENOUS MUSLIM TERRORISTS SO LET'S ECONOMICALLY AND POLITICALLY ISOLATE OURSELVES" type of stuff. Why anyone would register a protest vote for those jesters is beyond me.

And I don't see how in any way at all this result will predict the Euros in 2009? I think maybe you'r trying to comfort yourself with daydreaming here.

Intellectual policies that are being rejected at local level, intellectual policies rejected in London. Either your policies are not really that intellectual or they are just ****. I am not expecting an amazing result, but this will give the BNP a challenge and at the end of this the party will have learnt new things and will be able to take them newly learned things into future elections and improve our results in not so fertile ground.
UKIP seem to be on a downward spiral, they also have local problems in this area with the local chairman being expelled by the main party.
HM you are one of the most deluded posters on here at this moment in time, you remind me of 'Francis' who was predicting a humiliation at the London elections for BNP and wouldnt believe me that we would do well and win a seat. At the end of the day I was proven right and I am confident in my electoral knowledge, we will see who is right and who is wrong when the results are declared.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by blueblood1920:
Intellectual policies that are being rejected at local level, intellectual policies rejected in London. Either your policies are not really that intellectual or they are just ****. I am not expecting an amazing result, but this will give the BNP a challenge and at the end of this the party will have learnt new things and will be able to take them newly learned things into future elections and improve our results in not so fertile ground.
UKIP seem to be on a downward spiral, they also have local problems in this area with the local chairman being expelled by the main party.
HM you are one of the most deluded posters on here at this moment in time, you remind me of 'Francis' who was predicting a humiliation at the London elections for BNP and wouldnt believe me that we would do well and win a seat. At the end of the day I was proven right and I am confident in my electoral knowledge, we will see who is right and who is wrong when the results are declared.

I'm not a foolish optimist. I don't expect UKIP to get over 7% and I certainly don't expect the BNP to get over 2%. UKIP recently gained councillors, came 4th ragging the Greens in Crewe. I don't see either of these things, especially with much of the electorate in a fervent 'bash Brown' mentality as a "downward spiral". The only message the BNP will learn from Henley is this: only contest seats where you can whip up racial tension because of the low-paid racist vote you will undoubtedly receive there.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by UkipHM:
I'm not a foolish optimist. I don't expect UKIP to get over 7% and I certainly don't expect the BNP to get over 2%. UKIP recently gained councillors, came 4th ragging the Greens in Crewe. I don't see either of these things, especially with much of the electorate in a fervent 'bash Brown' mentality as a "downward spiral". The only message the BNP will learn from Henley is this: only contest seats where you can whip up racial tension because of the low-paid racist vote you will undoubtedly receive there.

You failed to save your deposit there as you have in the past 3 parliamentary by-elections UKIP have contested. In Crewe BNP didnt stand so its highly likely that some of your vote would of went to the BNP as it is proven that there is an overlap in voters.
BNP have been winning seats in areas that have very little racial tension, I dont believe sedgefield had many non-whites but the BNP still achieved 9% there.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Vortex:
How old are you or have you been on the juice?

OK Dumas,"66" and "Dont drink "were my answers to your two questions you asked above thicko,maybe its better not to answer any of the bnp troll puthy tat questions on here,I will just pick and choose which stuff to address in future,you might not like such distraction and distruction of what you put forth,but hey,that seems to be what you five want.Bring it on Habibi.
[Rep]