London Orbital 10:08 PM 14-08-2008
Originally Posted by TannyD:
And what would happen if we all just gave up and took that attitude and stopped supporting ourselves or at the very least actively looking for work...
"What if everyone felt that way? Then I'd be a damn fool to feel any other way, wouldn't I?" Yossarian replied.
The temptation to scrounge should be prevented through reform of the benefits system which actively encourages people not to bother actively searching for work & live off benefits instead.
No use expecting people to have the self-control not to take what has been placed on offer - & ought not to have been.
[Rep]
London Orbital 10:27 PM 14-08-2008
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
I think a legal minimum separation between children is better than a maximum total number. Then toddlers will get the undivided parental attention which they need, and transgressing parents can be caught when they have only had two children..
Interesting idea. But a woman should surely procreate when she is young and healthy enough to have healthy children.
And the undivided parental attention any child receives rather depends on the family, surely.
[Rep]
London Orbital 10:37 PM 14-08-2008
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
Anti-abortionists would find it hard to get a foetus to agree that it should have the right to live. I know, because I remember being an unusually bright foetus, conducting scientific experiments to my mother's great discomfort.
What a terrible little foetus you must have been.
What did you get up to in the womb then?
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
Many anti-abortionists are motivated by a wrong subconscious belief that they themselves are innately undesirable people who should be culled. They are campaigning by proxy for their own right to live. Undesirable? Yes. Innately? No. Should be culled? Not after the age of two.
So you believe in culling after birth? Why stop at the age of two?
[Rep]
British-Conservatism 02:27 PM 15-08-2008
The White British have a very low birthrate.
IMMIGRANTS have helped push Britain’s birth rate to its highest level in 25 years.
More than a fifth of births are now to women born outside the UK and their fertility rates are considerably higher than British-born mothers.
The general birth rate now suggests the average woman will have 1.87 children, according to the Office for National Statistics. That is the highest level since 1981.
Daily Express | UK News | Baby boom among migrants | Baby boom among migrants
[Rep]
TannyD 02:25 PM 18-08-2008
Originally Posted by London Orbital:
What a terrible little foetus you must have been.
What did you get up to in the womb then?
So you believe in culling after birth? Why stop at the age of two?
Believe it or not but Stewie is on this forum.
[Rep]
youcanhandlethetruth 09:13 PM 18-08-2008
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
Murder is wrong, not because God said thou shalt not kill, but because people would feel frightened if it were allowed.
i.e. don't do the right thing because of christian beliefs, but do it for the good of the people. Ok so far.
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
The really useful & happy people are those who think about their duties & achievements, not their rights.
Oh so you care about people being "frightened" but people should not have any rights ?
:-)
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
Rights are an issue for people who want to milk society, not contribute to it,
So why have the government got all the power then ?
:-)
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
This is their own fault for not seeking a psychiatric cure
i.e. you must feed the pharmaceutical industry profits in order to be sane even when there's nothing really wrong with you.
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
and their parents' fault for not loving them properly as infants. It is not usually the fault of society which they blame.
Yep - it's all
your fault people, stop blaming the corrupt governments and elites who kidnap and torture thousands of children every year (probably like this slimeball)
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
But the poorer people may well not want those rights
Oh you're so kind and good - you really care about helping these poor people not to have their rights
:-)
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
because I remember being an unusually bright foetus, conducting scientific experiments to my mother's great discomfort.
So you were a sicko degenerate scientist even before you were born causing your mother pain ?
:-)
Any you've got the cheek to say others should consider "seeking a psychiatric cure" ?
If I didn't know better I'd say this is a wind up but people like this really do exist.
Originally Posted by timwlandon:
Many anti-abortionists are motivated by a wrong subconscious belief that they themselves are innately undesirable people who should be culled.
Are you a eugenics scientist ?
You're a sick traitor to your country.
Remember you won't be spared when the elite have their way with you ok ?
You might think you're part of "society" but if you're part of any depopulation agenda, then you're being used, and you're a sick idiot without an ounce of moral fibre.
Repent from evil and try to live with some decency and self respect ok ?
[Rep]
angelman 02:21 PM 20-08-2008
Originally Posted by British-Conservatism:
The White British have a very low birthrate.
IMMIGRANTS have helped push Britain’s birth rate to its highest level in 25 years.
More than a fifth of births are now to women born outside the UK and their fertility rates are considerably higher than British-born mothers.
The general birth rate now suggests the average woman will have 1.87 children, according to the Office for National Statistics. That is the highest level since 1981.
Daily Express | UK News | Baby boom among migrants | Baby boom among migrants
Absolutely.
Look at who is having all the babies. WASPs, for want of a better term, are "lagging" far behind those from Caribbean and New Commonwealth backgrounds. No one ever seems to mention this as it would be seen as racist and the PC wooly hats would get over excited. However it is mentioned by (what are considered) nationalist parties as they think that Britain will be taken over by non-WASPs, which of course is true as they are having a lot more babies than WASPs. (nb I am not debating whether that matters or not)
[Rep]
Westcountryman 10:32 PM 20-08-2008
Originally Posted by angelman:
Absolutely.
Look at who is having all the babies. WASPs, for want of a better term, are "lagging" far behind those from Caribbean and New Commonwealth backgrounds. No one ever seems to mention this as it would be seen as racist and the PC wooly hats would get over excited. However it is mentioned by (what are considered) nationalist parties as they think that Britain will be taken over by non-WASPs, which of course is true as they are having a lot more babies than WASPs. (nb I am not debating whether that matters or not)
So which fascist tactic are you planning, forcing whites to have more children or preventing non-whites from having them?
[Rep]
angelman 10:43 PM 20-08-2008
Originally Posted by Westcountryman:
So which fascist tactic are you planning, forcing whites to have more children or preventing non-whites from having them?
Strewth. Why not read what I wrote especially the last bit in brackets?
If you want to avoid facts then that is your choice. It is fact that white people are having less babies than coloured people and that was all that I think that I wrote.
If you want to put your wooly hat on and start bringing race into it so be it. I sort of get the feeling that you think that I was advocating something akin to castration of all non-whites. Not sure quite where you got that from.
EDIT - OK have gone back and read what I wrote. When I wrote "they think that Britain will be taken over by non-WASPs, which of course is true as they are having a lot more babies than WASPs" I think that you might be reading too much into it. Possibly I could have written it differently.
[Rep]