Originally Posted by ranter:
Forced repatriation (apart from illeagle immigrants) would be a no go.
As far as the other undesiarables go we should be making it unnatractive for them to stay,no social handouts free housing & health ect.These people would not stay here or indeed come in the first place if it wasnt for the free ride they get.The economic migrants will hopefully return home with the predicted economic downturn especially when they find themselves unemployed with no dole money.
The Welfare State should be only for those who have put into the pot,not as a reserve bank for any Tom Dick or Abdul who can make it to our shores

Why is it a "no go"?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by For_England:
Not only is it the most humane and practical way for us to redress the terrible state of affairs inflicted on our people, a very generous but thorough repatriation is a moral imperative.

I don`t see why we should be generous! They have had enough generosity from us already! Time to ship them all back and cease all foreign aid!
[Rep]

Originally Posted by gimlet:
It is new Labour policy.

it is? how?
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Imperium:
I don`t see why we should be generous! They have had enough generosity from us already! Time to ship them all back and cease all foreign aid!

Just for the inconvenience of having to go back, not because we owe it, but out of the largeness of our generosity. Our government are the ones who invited them to the UK, and if we were in their position we probably would have come over too. And from a practical perspective, I do believe that to be rid of the foreigners within our shores, that a programme of voluntary repatriation, initially, would be better. We also have to persuade countries to take them, and that means $$$. Then we use the carrot and stick approach to rid our shores of the Muslims. At the end of the day I just want Britain back the way it was, when it was safe for white people to walk the streets and take the buses, and when we could be proud of who we are, without having to take back seat.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by Imperium:
Why is it a "no go"?

Where would you draw the line? Recent arrivals,Ist generation ,2nd, 5th?
What would you do if they refused to leave?
It would all just get too messy
[Rep]

Ranter, the point with these arguments is that it depends on the circumstances. If this country does break down into ethnic conflicts and there are signs it already is then, as Enoch said, "Repatriation is the lesser of the two evils." People who don't think it will come to that are being over-optimistic, I think.
[Rep]

Originally Posted by ranter:
Where would you draw the line? Recent arrivals,Ist generation ,2nd, 5th?
What would you do if they refused to leave?
It would all just get too messy

Anybody who is obviously of unAryan stock. There is also the option of sterilisation.
They won`t have much choice but to leave when a gun is pointed at them.
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
You can`t make an omlette without cracking a few eggs!
[Rep]

The Pakistanis are of course of Aryan stock and thousands of Indian Muslims from what is now Pakistan were supposedly present at the Nuremburg rallies. The Kashmiris in particular are true Aryans. If we kept them then at least we could retain the recipes for a few good curries. Just a thought. :-)
[Rep]

In reality repatriation is not a workable option.

Illegal immigrants should always be deported, as happens elsewhere. Criminals should be deported. The right to be a British subject should be given out more carefully. A sovereign country could set up quota systems and ensure that time limits and contracts are adhered to. People who come to do much needed work should be treated scrupulously fairly and made welcome whilst they are here as should tourists.

Fairness and equality of treatment with reciprocal arrangements with our friends and allies around the world should be considered. I'm happy for a person to receive benefits in this country if I can receive the same benefits in that person's homeland.

Racist drivel about Aryans (not all white, not all blue eyed and most not particulary pure as DNA tests are proving) or pointing guns or sterilisation belongs in the 30s and 40s. It was tosh then and it is tosh now.
[Rep]

Imperium

Im all for ridding the country of those who dont contribute,the immigrants who live on the social,those who dont abide by our laws and while we have unemployed people a tighter control of migrant workers.
Your not talking of cracking a few eggs here ,more like sending the foxes into the hen house
Ethnic cleansing is the term your looking for
[Rep]