Is Repatriation practicable?

Ethnic cleansing has not taken place in the UK since 1948. People have abandoned the less attractive and run down inner cities for more pleasant suburbs as properity has increased. The migrants on the bottom rung have moved into those districts in large numbers. There will be known isolated incidents of people being forced from their homes, but there is no systematic ethnic cleansing as there was of Jews before 1945 and Germans after 1945. You belittle the horrors of ethnic cleansing, some of which I have been privy to in the Balkans and elsewhere where I have seen refugee camps and burnt out villages and towns.

Millions of Brits have left voluntarily since 1948 to settle in the Commonwealth, USA and southern Europe. Nobody, except a few nutters, talks of Brits ethnically cleansing the Costa del Sol or wherever. Two of UKIP's original 12 MEPs have settled in the EU as have many supporters. How is it ethnic cleansing if 20 Bangla Deshi families choose to live together in one street and open a mini-market, but not ethnic cleansing when whole resorts with English pubs, English speaking golf clubs, English shops and English language newspapers are established in Spain?

The Maori and Aborigine tribal groups have been ethnically cleansed as have most American natives. Should they not be allowed to deport all the arrivals since 1948? Parts of Oz would be very empty.

[Rep]

Originally Posted by Ken:
Ethnic cleansing has been going on against English people in this country since 1948. You should have noticed. Enoch did. That is why they hsad to build new towns.

I think you may be a bit confused Ken. Immigration is not ethnic cleansing,
The new towns built after WWII were to replace the bomb damaged cities and to give the people a better standard of living.(debatable).
"New Town" expansion in the 60's for reasons of population overspill,(from London) was before the mass immigration we are seeing today

[Rep]

Originally Posted by Aardvark:
The Pakistanis are of course of Aryan stock and thousands of Indian Muslims from what is now Pakistan were supposedly present at the Nuremburg rallies. The Kashmiris in particular are true Aryans. If we kept them then at least we could retain the recipes for a few good curries. Just a thought. :-)

Absolute nonsense! In 500 years time I dare say this remark will be made about the bastardised coffee coloured population of Britain on the basis that they speak English!
What you see in Pakistan and India today are people who speak an Indo-European tongue but are not Indo-European by origin. Only a few living in those countries today have kept their blood pure or relatively pure and are indistinguishable from Europeans: They and only they may be considered in those lands as being Aryan.

[Rep]

[quote=Aardvark;505244]

Originally Posted by :
In reality repatriation is not a workable option.

Why is it not "workable"?

Originally Posted by :
Racist drivel about Aryans (not all white, not all blue eyed and most not particulary pure as DNA tests are proving) or pointing guns or sterilisation belongs in the 30s and 40s. It was tosh then and it is tosh now.

Where is you evidence in support of your above remark?
And why does "pointing guns or sterilisation beling in the 30s and 40s"?

[Rep]

Originally Posted by ranter:
Imperium

Im all for ridding the country of those who dont contribute,the immigrants who live on the social,those who dont abide by our laws and while we have unemployed people a tighter control of migrant workers.
Your not talking of cracking a few eggs here ,more like sending the foxes into the hen house
Ethnic cleansing is the term your looking for

I would prefer to term it mass repatriation. I see no reason to cleanse anyone.:-)

[Rep]

Originally Posted by VanillaSpice:
What people need to do is understand more. People who live in this country, and did so for generations, are part of the country and they have given a lot and made incredible imput in different ways.

Typical Labour text book rhetoric. Nobody ever consulted the British peoples on the subject of whether they wished to see their country invaded by the refuse of the world and yet ironically they fought a war to defend Britain from the illusion of German invasion!
There is black humour in that paradox should you wish to look for it!

[Rep]

Originally Posted by Aardvark:
Ethnic cleansing has not taken place in the UK since 1948. People have abandoned the less attractive and run down inner cities for more pleasant suburbs as properity has increased. The migrants on the bottom rung have moved into those districts in large numbers. There will be known isolated incidents of people being forced from their homes, but there is no systematic ethnic cleansing as there was of Jews before 1945 and Germans after 1945. You belittle the horrors of ethnic cleansing, some of which I have been privy to in the Balkans and elsewhere where I have seen refugee camps and burnt out villages and towns.

Millions of Brits have left voluntarily since 1948 to settle in the Commonwealth, USA and southern Europe. Nobody, except a few nutters, talks of Brits ethnically cleansing the Costa del Sol or wherever. Two of UKIP's original 12 MEPs have settled in the EU as have many supporters. How is it ethnic cleansing if 20 Bangla Deshi families choose to live together in one street and open a mini-market, but not ethnic cleansing when whole resorts with English pubs, English speaking golf clubs, English shops and English language newspapers are established in Spain?

The Maori and Aborigine tribal groups have been ethnically cleansed as have most American natives. Should they not be allowed to deport all the arrivals since 1948? Parts of Oz would be very empty.

The settlement of millions of racially alien and diverse peoples into Britain without the consent of the British peoples and the introduction of draconian legislation to silence any effective dissent equates to a slow but sure genocide of the British peoples.

[Rep]