http://www.ukwatch.net/article/this_...orism_is_bogus

"The conclusion of all this analysis must surely be that the “global war on terrorism” has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda – the US goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project. Is collusion in this myth and junior participation in this project really a proper aspiration for British foreign policy? If there was ever need to justify a more objective British stance, driven by our own independent goals, this whole depressing saga surely provides all the evidence needed for a radical change of course."

Michael Meacher MP was environment minister from May 1997 to June 2003
meacherm@parliament.uk
[Rep]

Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth:
http://www.ukwatch.net/article/this_...orism_is_bogus

"The conclusion of all this analysis must surely be that the “global war on terrorism” has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda – the US goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project. Is collusion in this myth and junior participation in this project really a proper aspiration for British foreign policy? If there was ever need to justify a more objective British stance, driven by our own independent goals, this whole depressing saga surely provides all the evidence needed for a radical change of course."

Michael Meacher MP was environment minister from May 1997 to June 2003
meacherm@parliament.uk

Yes it is bogus, you can handle the truth, glad you are back. People who speak the truth like you do should not leave the forum! The NWO is the real plot, taking over the world, nazi 2 alias Bush administration. He also goes on the moral high ground against china about darfur when in his own country he wants the law changing to remove bans against torture.
ny times 2.3.08
> "Some may argue that we would be more effective if we sanctioned torture or other expedient methods to obtain information from the enemy," General Petraeus wrote. "They would be wrong. Beyond the basic fact that such actions are illegal, history shows that they also are frequently neither useful nor necessary."

NO NEED TO USE TORTURE, THEY HAVE LIE DETECTOR TECHNOLOGY AND CAN READ MINDS

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/op...gewanted=print
Horryfing and unnecesary EXPANDING TORTURE

Method and apparatus for truth detection - US Patent 5406956 LIE DETECTOR
[Rep]

Bush really is loosing it.
[Rep]

Thanks for your kind words Ihope - I must be crazy ! :-))

Yes by changing the definition of torture they can get away with anything without reproach - whatever happened to the Geneva convention ?

I'm not sure about lie detector machines though Ihope - would you like to see someone convicted on lie detector/mind reading evidence ?

I've heard Bush is losing it too(did he ever have it ?) but I believe he is only a puppet for the globalist bankers.
I wish I could say it, but if Obama/Hilary/McCain get in I don't think anything will change because of who's at the helm(unless it's Ron Paul).

Do you know who Obama's biggest advisor is ?!!!


What a great man Kennedy was.
[Rep]

Is this the same class warrior who when environment minister complained about people with second homes despite owning with his wife some dozen properties ?
[Rep]

I saw an interview with Meacher a while back. I got the impression he i very uncomftable with what Blair and Brown have done, and believes there has been an agender of ******** put out by them in order to get their own ways (i.e. the WMD dossier).

Ea of dune
[Rep]

agenda of ? That was just getting good....

But yes Ea Of Dune - the Iraq dossier was no more than complete fabrication.
But we're meant to trust the "war on terror" ?
Do me a favour.....
[Rep]

This is the guy who said his father was 'an agricultural worker' when in fact he was a retired accountant with a market garden.
[Rep]

hahaha :-) hardly picking strawberries in rural Kent is it !

Ea of dune
[Rep]